RE: Explorations in failure - trying to get a LLM to detect LLM generated content on HIVE
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
At some point I think we'll have to get used to consuming mostly AI generated content (and liking it!) since it'll be so much more efficient to generate it than to have content created by humans. So long as there's value in this kind of content, there shouldn't be a big issue with AI created content, should it? From my short time on this platform, however, I haven't yet understood the relationship between a content quality and number of upvotes and rewards. There's probably some auto voting going on or something
0
0
0.000
Oh there absolutely is auto voting going on, and that saddens me. I have done analysis on post length as an indicator of quality in the past, and that doesn't seem to have a correlation.
https://peakd.com/hive-133987/@holoz0r/hive-post-rewards-and-word-counts-22-jul-29-jul
From my few days here so far it seems there's fairly little manual voting going on. I suppose that's because votes are somewhat of a limited resource as far as I can tell. But it would be cool if people just treated votes like likes - "I like it so I upvote". I guess because there's a financial element to it people become very strategic about their votes
I think because a lot of people automate - this makes their manual votes rarer.
For manual votes to work, people need to actually open their eyes and engage with the content!