RE: Posts, Word Count, Rewards, Communities, and other weekly analytical reports - 3rd Week of July
You are viewing a single comment's thread:
Length and intent seem like a fair starting criteria.
To see authors think outside the box, we have to start by defining it. So I think having some set rules is a good place to build from... of course while keeping in mind a healthy threshold for the rule-breakers.
0
0
0.000
Yes. I don't want to see someone stretch out a story or a review of something to 1000 words just because of some vague criteria. Sometimes, you can say the same thing in 200 words.
Going from that 1000 words to 200 words is what takes some real skill, though.
At the same time, 20 progress pictures of an artwork is a lot of effort. A description of each step is even more effort. A video documenting the drawing with verbal commentary about thinking about the work as its being made is probably more insightful, again.
But at the end of the day, the artwork is the output - it is what people will put on their walls or go see at a gallery. The journey of that creation is usually for the creator, and it is good to see it documented.
My view is that there is no alternative for looking at the content itself, and being able to see "through the bullshit" that some people hide behind in the creation of their posts, like, for example; over complicating the process, or making it appear to be very complicated and require a lot of skill, when, in reality, sitting down with someone for 20-40 minutes would get someone with no skill to have significantly more skill in that field.
I am aware of the fact, that with this response, I am rambling, and probably going into much detail, and possibly losing focus of what I was trying to say, but data is data, and content should make us feel something, we should connect with it.
Sometimes we do that if its longer, sometimes we do that if it is shorter, but the trend on HIVE, I think is that the combination of laziness and persistence is rewarded over ambition and persistence.
Uff as an illustrator I'm certainly guilty of presenting artwork this way... I guess we're all just trying to be seen here and evolve with whatever format seems to be working while discarding the ones that actually make sense.
Do you use traditional media or digitally illustrate?
I know that (I can't remember the name of the app on iPad) has a "video output" feature that shows the development of the work from the blank canvas to the point you output it, and its very interesting, but I am certainly no illustrator - but I did go to art school.
What I learned there is that everyone's practice is entirely different and unique to themselves, and they do it for different reasons, and present it in different ways, too!
That is what makes us all so darn interesting!
These days, most of my artwork is digital. I do a lot of vector designs and occasionally I also do digital painting. So much of my work is spontaneous, where I cant really tell you if I even have 'a technique' (if that makes sense).
So long as it is done for you! :) That's the most important thing.